Whether the Seventh Amendment allows an action to be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 — without a finding of factual error — six months after the issuance of an 'Order Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915' for the same actions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW! 1. Whether the Seventh Amendment allows an action to be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 — without a finding of factual error — six months after the issuance of an “Order Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for the same actions. 2. Whether a pro se prisoner complaint, which pled facts demonstrating each prong of 18 U.S.C. § 242, can fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 3. Whether dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) are reviewed de novo or for abuse of discretion. 1 INCLUDED QUESTIONS: e Whether it is “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests” standard under Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987), for a prison official to insist to the reporting victim, that a fellow prison official’s conduct was not a crime. e Whether the Constitution and the laws of the United States are the supreme law within prison walls. . iofyv , II. LIST OF ALL PARTIES A. Petitioner, Pro Se 4. John P. Fletcher #81478 B.V.C.F. East 1-S-12 P.O. Box 2017 Buena Vista, Colorado 81211 B. Respondents 5. Celia A. Schwartz, Dent — First Name Unknown, Hansen — First Name Unknown, Edwin Herndon, Jason Lisac, David Lengerich, and Rick Raemisch Cc. Counsel for All Respondents 6. Colorado Attorney General’s Office 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, Colorado 80203 D.