Why was the petitioner arrested on a forensic charge when the videos clearly show the victim's right hand that is clearly seen in the videos to prove the accusation is false?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i, Why Was WP Th« Pepe rests peter (bN A, forensic § ciewrisc ll VLU qe af compare ny night haste the tlghchand thats tlearly $e eu je the vitleos) 70 Prove 1h tif acc satinnlsya og aro S, Oss ki Mprl ail 5, Rael FUe33 ES? LiWiy was nig wecera ation Whee bMired down fron oyer TOOUQUSS T0 QbOUD Five MinUI“es tenvilie our adi at rhe COs rau’ heavy os pausht of badgers COCS/ON, Threads, Mind GAMES brousAr ev by rhe Aaecs et , 3. Whu wasny THE vicrlin$ OF Abr BISTYIS jy rtitog dion videos where she was heanly bere awd badseréd ro he atl ety thdt DT dud some/any thy 10 her unal she crged prenuse she bidur wha 70 lead sag Ther £ dik Somelanythiey to hts or her cr étes Chow I 4, Why wade her criss inmeaganiOn vided. where che sags THAT hor pres Aan fary ly ruler pres fufils Wtth tell phorles, ait Ler hie alid her Sista’ Vitel AWA Motte HO OPA) OW TV. Bd eaaazi nes antald their mother males them waren hes awither boulneythar mulryp le minors have sexatrer furwishiwy with drugs anhal cohol? S.wWhy are my covsran’ réguesrs To havea foréd/sie $i eas? Cyo vidu) au compare yy right bawd To the righ? band Tae C40 be clearly seée ye threes Thirty secoud Lideos}aud D414. plas Olde Tosts, thins sheer Caw and will prove my (NVaCEN Ce, alusay s Adimtd? ‘ C.Why weit The PiOSECUTOF aud Aer ees we AlleWka 10 bee comstUW rly Moning trial? _ TWh y Weert any ob rhe hails Who were Talis Arugs awit dvith we aleohi Landahe Lue ktched our of rie roon (cawsruiny) thar had the cell puoet, whith wis ALOAYS LV JLALN SIGHT, while shese hits van arrow with UST phew pikmpes Of tier eas ayeeTMit On Fabs ole tlt 3S. Why were the prsedib: aud deprewe the ebly PLOple TO g/ance AT The Pity TAM) hy Mr. Ryast Kolbech, for oly Ove secon, while, The Se age, Tury, a USS, Ov fof2 SEC SOLOW INST, WELL Wore lle 70 Vit) ack COMPALE WY hawt she hawd WW the Ads? . Wh? a) TI € 8fawa’ , oy 4 tony waste? Zable rp ARTs fe Neo ascistamecof eouucel, which ke hlidben hime cowsitcred * i¢ iy aaa) 1, Why 15 EVERY atrEempt L Ake ro PROVE MY LANO CELE CONSVANFLY DENIED? (2. wha ws The prosecatbr ree girly PEO WhO could piche let Lary 2 ; 1S, whe did rhe norbor,who adn secad ro cowss anoly breabeng iy ald earesits leroom whickhad rhe etdl phowe EN PLAIN STOUT, 25 always, 70 Vernve aby aud al ob her properiy Whi cn these wits Mabe, obly clair The Ll PHONE afvtr The Vitleos wire Yseavtred.” 14, Why waswyr rhe boy who found "the vidlios wry ro gag? Is.why dtd EVERYBORY volved atith my silegal acarcera maw, elt Uy OME, Vigh? wt ACL, cuddly “Geare’? ; /6.cwhy wesw) The wotenook, which cowgapas ty rhowghrs daring raval wrrehaced”