No. 18-7862
Vincent Beatty, aka Jamaal Beatty, aka Vincent Daward Beatty, aka Mozzi v. United States
Tags: abuse-of-discretion advisory-guidelines criminal-history criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing felon-in-possession reasonableness reasonableness-review sentencing-guidelines sentencing-variance sua-sponte upward-variance
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sua sponte upward variance sentence is reasonable where the advisory Guideline range accurately reflected the defendant's conduct and prior history
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a sua sponte upward variance sentence is reasonable where the advisory Guideline range accurately reflected the defendant’s conduct and prior history.
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vincent Beatty
Jonathan David Byrne — Federal Pub Defender S. Dist., Petitioner
Jonathan David Byrne — Federal Pub Defender S. Dist., Petitioner