No. 18-7865

Svitlana Drozdovska v. Seminole County, Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: ada ada-compliance civil-rights county-responsibility due-process federal-funding florida-law florida-state-law legal-remedy local-government-liability sidewalk-maintenance work-order
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in finding that Seminole County was not responsible for maintaining the sidewalk under the ADA and Florida law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | humbly request a new trial which will be in accordance with the law . The nature of their order was their final decision finding in favor of Seminole County as not being responsible or in violation of A.D.A. rules and were responsible to maintain established sidewalks in Seminole County in a safe manner for citizens to use safely. This is a violation of Florida State laws and Federal laws. it is in fact the full responsibility of Seminole County to maintain city sidewalks properly based of the Green Book and many other mandates provided by the Federal Funding programs. Seminole County in fact had determined that this exact section of sidewalk needed to be repaired and my attorney at the time of trial produced an official Seminole County Work Order work that had been issues THREE years prior.

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Seminole County, Florida
David R. KuhnFissman Barrelt, Respondent
David R. KuhnFissman Barrelt, Respondent
Svitlana Drozdovska
Svitlana Drozdovska — Petitioner
Svitlana Drozdovska — Petitioner