Whether defense counsel withheld evidence that could have shown the petitioner was actually innocent

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED areener defense counsel withheld evidence for the jury that shown that the petitioer was actually inocent, but for a reasonable probability that the outcome of ; the trial would have been different. 7 . (2). Where any person may be restrained of his Liberty in Violation of the Const. (3), Whether this claim rests on a New Rule , (4). Whether a petitioner seeks to apply a rule of law that was clearly establised at the time his state court conviction became Final. . (5). Whether state court or the federal court applied the federal law established by those case unreasonably. (6). Whether the state court relied on adequate and independant state ground of decision to trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. (7). Whether the resuit was dictated by past case or Whether it is suscaptible to debate among resonable Minds. (8).Whether petitioner denied an opportunity for A Pull and Fair adjudication his ineffective assistance of counsel at trial or denied his Due Process to develop a re cord outside the trial records for his 2254 federal heabeas writ. . (9). Whether the state habeas court was bias and objective unresonable impartial in it's failure to review and excute a Finding of Fact and Concluion of Law. . (10). Whether the AEDPA is Notorious for its poor drafting or The Act is replete with vague and ambiguaus language apparrent inconsistenly and plain Bag Grammar that denied the petitioner his right to Due PROCESS ; . (11). Whether the Judgment was erroneages? (12). Whether the petitioner denied a Fair Trial in the state court. (13). Whether State court's finding were unreasonable inlight of the evidence the s state court considered. — (14). Whether 2254 (d). is difficult to identify that it denied the petitioner Due Process or Statute alters the standard of review that federal habeas court's bring to Bear when they examine state court judgment on Federal Claims.