Robert Lee Rhoe, II v. Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Custodial Parent and MCOCSE's actions in economically enslaving the Petitioner through child support and U.S. citizenship claims over his DNA violate the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition on involuntary servitude
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Enma Quispe Perez (hereinafter Custodial Parent) pointed Montgomery County Maryland Office of Child Support Enforcement (hereinafter referred to as MCOCSE) to Robert L. Rhoe, II, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) alleging him to be the father of a child as a condition for financial assistance. Both MCOCSE and the Custodial ; Parent have significant vested interests of child support and U. S. citizenship over the Life, Liberty, Property, and extended-life potential earnings from Petitioner's deoxyribonucleic acid (hereinafter referred to as DNA) as a result of economically enslaving him, Amendment XIII, U.S. Constitution (Page v,