No. 18-787

Robert Lee Rhoe, II v. Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2018-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 13th-amendment child-support civil-rights dna dna-rights due-process economic-enslavement liberty paternity-testing property takings thirteenth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Custodial Parent and MCOCSE's actions in economically enslaving the Petitioner through child support and U.S. citizenship claims over his DNA violate the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition on involuntary servitude

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Enma Quispe Perez (hereinafter Custodial Parent) pointed Montgomery County Maryland Office of Child Support Enforcement (hereinafter referred to as MCOCSE) to Robert L. Rhoe, II, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) alleging him to be the father of a child as a condition for financial assistance. Both MCOCSE and the Custodial ; Parent have significant vested interests of child support and U. S. citizenship over the Life, Liberty, Property, and extended-life potential earnings from Petitioner's deoxyribonucleic acid (hereinafter referred to as DNA) as a result of economically enslaving him, Amendment XIII, U.S. Constitution (Page v,

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement to respond filed.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement
Julia Doyle BernhardtOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Julia Doyle BernhardtOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Robert Lee Rhoe
Robert Lee Rhoe II — Petitioner
Robert Lee Rhoe II — Petitioner