No. 18-7875
Lionel Cannon, aka Cannon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: carpenter-precedent carpenter-v-united-states criminal-procedure fourth-amendment franks-hearing law-enforcement search-and-seizure vehicle-search warrant-requirement warrantless-search wiretaps
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Cannon denied his Fourth Amendment rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented Lionel Cannon Argued in the Court below that the District Court erred in denying his motion for a Franks hearing, and that Court abused its discretion in its interpretation of the necessity clause fot the wiretaps. Separately, Cannon argued that he was denied his rights under the ; Fourth Amendment when law enforcement searched his vehicle without a warrant. Recently, this Court issued the opinion in Carpenter which provided his claimts | support and he placed the Third Circuit on notice of that decision. Was Cannon denied his Fourth Amendment rights? -i
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent