No. 18-7876
Jordie L. Callahan v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment competency-hearing criminal-procedure criminal-proceedings direct-appeal due-process effective-assistance-counsel effective-assistance-of-counsel mental-capacity mental-competency mental-evaluation sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Mentally Deficient Defendant is Entitled to a Competency Hearing or Mental Evaluation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether a Mentally Deficient Defendant is Entitled to a Competency Hearing or Mental Evaluation to Determine if the Defendant is in Fact Capable of Assisting Counsel in His/Her Own Defense Whether a Mentally Deficient Defendant is . Entitled to Effective Assistance of Counsel in All Stages of the Criminal Proceedings Whether a Mentally Deficient Defendant Received Due Process When’ Counsel Failed.to Request a Mental. Evaluation, or Competency Hearing Whether a Mentally Deficient Defendant has a ; Sixth Amendment. Right to. Effective. Assistance of . Counsel on Direct Appeal
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent