No. 18-7884
Paula Villalva-Patricio v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pertinent-information right-to-testify sixth-amendment testify translation-of-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel when Appellant wished to testify or otherwise introduce pertinent information and her attorney failed to do so?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel when Appellant wished to testify or otherwise introduce pertinent information and her attorney failed to do so? 2. Whether the Defendant received a fair trial if the translation of proceedings was deficient? i
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-19
Waiver of right of respondent USA to respond filed.
2019-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Paula Villalva-Patricio
James Bailey Halliday Sr. — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
James Bailey Halliday Sr. — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
USA
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent