Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred in Failing to grant Petitioner's Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim/Argument reganding= defense counsel(Stanclift)UnLawful/UnConsentable Conflict Of Interestand or Safeguard Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to A Lawyer UnEncumbered by an Actual Conflict or Serious Potential for Conflict Of Interest?"

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION (1) Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred in Failing to grant Petitioner's Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim/Argument reganding= defense Conflict Of Interest"and or Safeguard Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to A Lawyer UnEncumbered by an Actual Conflict or Serious Potential for Conflict Of Interest? QUESTION (2) : Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred/Acted Contrary to established Sixth Amendment Guarantees Of The United States and State Of New York Constitutions and or Federal Standards due petitioner regarding trial court's Conflict Of Interest Inquiry Colloquy Claim/Argument? QUESTION (3) Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Acted Contrary to — 5,6,by Failing to grant Petitioner's Claim/Argument regarding defense to raise petitioner's Bs "ENTRAPMENT Defense"? QUESTION (4) Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred in Allowing Prejudicial testimony/ evidence to be considered by the Grand Jury? » ' QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Con't. QUESTION (5) Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred/Acted Contrary to established Federal Case Law in failing to grant Petitioner's Claim/Argument regarding trial court's failure to provide meaningful Supplemental /Charge Instructions to the Grand Jury?