No. 18-7892

Sheila J. Halousek v. California Public Employees' Retirement System

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-02-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: autonomy civil-rights due-process employment-retaliation osha osha-protections privacy privacy-rights whistleblower workplace-safety
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is required for the consistent application of civil rights to be 'free and independent,' 'enjoying and defending life and liberty,' and 'pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy' in determining and making informed medical choices, and for redress of violations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED With regard to the violation of Petitioner’s civil rights to be “free and independent,” “enjoying and defending life and liberty,” and “pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy” in determining and making her own informed medical choices: what is required for the consistent application of these civil rights and for redress of violations? With regard to workplace conditions: what is required under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) of 1970; which includes whistleblower or anti-retaliation provisions making it illegal for an employer to fire, demote, transfer or otherwise retaliate against a worker because the employee has filed a complaint or otherwise exercised any rights . provided to employees; for the consistent application of law requiring an employer to assure safe and healthful working conditions, as Respondents failed to provide Petitioner with a safe environment; what is the redress for her being attacked and retaliated against? With regard to the violation of Petitioner’s rights for due process in terminating her employment: what is required for the consistent application of these civil rights and for redress of violations? With regard to the violation of Petitioner’s rights to privacy: what is required for the consistent application of these civil rights and for redress of violations? ii

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Sheila Halousek
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner