No. 18-7893

Sheila J. Halousek v. Bank of America, N.A.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-02-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights consistent-application constitutional-law due-process legal-notice legal-relief notice process-service relief service-of-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What constitutes due process for proper notice in service of process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The federal mandated civil rights to due process are so vital and inherent to the fundamental and effective operation of law as to warrant two Amendments, the Fifth and the ; Fourteenth Amendments, to the United States Constitution, which stipulates that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." In this case, the lower court” has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of proceedings with regard to these civil rights as to necessitate clarification. First, what constitutes due process in order to provide actual notice as legally required for process service? Second, what is required for the consistent application of this law? Third, what is required for the application of relief when said law is violated? ii .

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Sheila J. Halousek
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner