No. 18-7894

Roszetta McNeill v. Wayne County Third Circuit Court, et al

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 7th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process equal-protection fraud fraud-exception fraud-exception-rooker-feldman judicial-activism rooker-feldman-doctrine statute-of-limitations superintendent-control
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it appropriate to request 'Superintendent Control' from the higher courts (in accordance to Article 3, section 2 of the Constitution) when the lower courts commit acts of 'Fraud' and 'Judicial Activism' with the intent to violate the 7th and 14th Amendment to Constitution (Equal protection, right to trial by jury and violation of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, respectively)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED + Is it appropriate to request “Superintendent Control” from the higher courts (in accordance to Article 3, section 2 of the Constitution) when the lower courts | _ commit acts of “Fraud” and “Judicial Activism” with the intent to violate the; | 7 and 14th Amendment to Constitution ( Equal protection, right to trial by jury and violation of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, respectively)?” + Do “fraud” change the outcome of a case (either state of federal)? + Is Fraud the exception to the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine? + Do every subsequent act of “Fraud” toll the “Statute of Limitation for Fraud?” II

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Roszetta McNeill
Roszetta Marie McNeill — Petitioner
Roszetta Marie McNeill — Petitioner