Was the defendant denied his state and federal constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to prepare for trial and coerced him to plead guilty when he wanted to go to trial?

No question identified. : PREAMBLE . This Retton is walien by a pcisoner who 1S Tn Poo Per, © am \ikce_ most obher PMSoNeCS whe have Ween Forced into Ye prose lpracket due +0 Ve lacks of Prnoncinl MsoreesRut; T embrace is challenue and fntend fo Win WM eal pete by eeluing on Ihe United Stakes Consittudio and it's Seprome Laws and avarentees oF protectin From acbitrory Nd COPCiCioS Government Agents whem have wnfermetion that tT will relay to Gorall VO Her whet decision is made on this pedidvon, wsr know Hat £owill be back in his court kame dey, Whediner id's As A Nudge lomyer or Ihe BAS Corps pebidimer For Certierarts Tom Jerry Bn derson it ond F_ helfeve. ther Id Will ne dhe Sparks Wat ignites tre Bre of whet wilt called “the Constitediong | | No moter whet position Yak o heft : From E+ will be known all across America Treat Ve. US Coston Io Supreme and | iS to be respected cleove all others i | — Enyou a) | Quwrstins Presented | te WAS DEFEN DVT REWEED Hes STATE WWD || FEDERAL CONSTETUTIOWAL REGHTS To EFFECTIVE SESTAWCE OF COUNSEL WHEW HES PITORIWEY _ FRELEN To PREPARED PoR TRIAL WWD) COERCED HOM To PLEAD GuELTY WHEW He WeWTEO JOGO TO TREBL . eit QUE PROCESS VEOLHTED WHeke THE DEFEWORWT WHS HELD To AWSWER POR & CHPETOL ; og OTHERWISE TWEAMOUS CRIME WETHOUT | BEING PRESEWTED O02 INDECTEN BY A GRAND SALT) ben Coveaimewtae mrscovmer Dereve I DEFEWVDMVIIOF HLS PVE PROCESS REGHTS OF THE | = COWSTLTUTLOW Wwewns Views XWVE TW) ee gecenpane make F kwewsne VOLUNTARY I EWTELL EE GEWT PLER BEFORE THE DSSTRECT 7 CUE k WHS DVE PROCESS VPoLwrEn ASH RESVLT RS _ WU) Ws we process vrorwreO wHeee DEFEWOIIVT __ DLO WoT EWTE B KNOWENG, VOLUVIBRY, TWTELLEGEMT _ [PLZ OE SELOWD DEGREE MUeDEe EV CeecurT ee jai _o i eige —___ | Question S Presented Cont . __ WAS DEFewnaiT DENEEN EEFECTIve WSSEST MCE ; OF WELLE COMSEL WHERE SHE Fart er _sto enrse susstmnrceL charms YD SHE lpmpen THE DeFEVDOWTS REGHTS Ti RHTSE (He Ch¥tms HImseL Ee? | _ OTEL Tssues with de Stors next to then OS new issues under the authlty of “Pro Perm _. icadron fec league. do > agpeent in acriming | case . Ito He. Michigan Spreme Court General Inskredeas™ || Page. Ci) in part “on these pages, Nou G4 __ Jas We, Supreme Court to Consider issues thed weve not Carsed in the Court of Mpygenis. 2 he considered “ex\wausted™ lu CeAvra\ Courts ene | oc purposes 0 Federc| Habeas Corpus. T+ is Mu_assection thed guestions ome lee Aewalnie on _divecé Neviene because Earn lenpealing_on the writ of Corbina! Phe ___ | Nudement of the Stele cont decisfon ond this is nod & habeas corpus proceeding : i List of Pores | | NERY MESO ME sors [56/42 _ Pee ME COO, BA777S | Vv Genesee CC/ Ib-039/4S—FE : STATE OF MECHEGMIV a __ | en) Wnderson St a Ge K Hewrison Correcting | ; C727 € Beeeher St | | a : /P8dtee we 4422 a || 42 5 Saginoue 54 | | fling, We 4BS02. _| — | a | | _ Table o€ Contents | [Pemble Questins Presented Terits . oo “Ee Contents | Jule of avtheridies | VL VII | | [cetians of o6iClal fepots _ Vill | | Resis_o€ durfeatction Vil © sthAioncl pawvisty Sy Ste bes ect _ VAL |X | Keasens for revbiing wit S38 | | [ipgendixc _ fe2 | | | A G\) OO | | __ | Acizona v Gent, SSb US 332 (200%) py [Ratley v Later 204 F supp 3d ASS le) py Wis | Recie v Onto, 374 v5 84 WH) pg ___lipercer v Unites Soles, 295 US 72.0435) [Roxkin v Haboma,34S US 238 (404) og. 9,2627 || Brody v Uinted Stedes, 397 us 742 C1970) pg IF _ | Coolidge Vv New Hampshire, 403 VS 443 (1477) ey B arp V Veron, 358 US | (1958) py M514 | _ in hour v Samant, 5 P3d Zl 4%) py 13 [Ducky v Unihed Seles, BU2 US Yoz Ciao) 9 23-24 [Ealy v Vie don, S64 F2d 2191078) pg IS Evits v Lucey, Y69 US 387 (1984) Gordon v Uniled Fetes, BUY US 4141453) pg [Henerson v Morgen, 426 US 37 IG7e) ey 25-26 [ill Lockhart, 474 vs $2 C495) gg SO Hilly Loctchert, $77 F2d 69g (i499) POS ill v ose S74 F Supp 1080 (1483) e917 | _ I Howledt v Rose, Yo4 0S 35i2Cid%) pg HIB Hufiade v Cedifornfa, M0 VS Ste (384) py TEI. Ente falm 255 Mich 632.0193!) pg [\clanson_v Zerbst, 304 US