No. 18-7904
Spassky Alcequiecz v. Kelly A. Ryan, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel manslaughter manslaughter-instruction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial, due to ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED. : WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, DUE TO INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE © OF COUNSEL, AS COUNSEL"S ABANDONEMENT ON A MANSLAUGHTER INSTRUCTION ON PROVOCATION, ON A BELIEF., WHICH COUNSEL. NOW ADMITS WAS WRONG, DEPRIVED THE PETITIONER OF DUE . PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT : TO THE UNITED STATE CONSTITUTION.
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent Ryan, Warden to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Ryan, Warden
Susanne G. Reardon — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Susanne G. Reardon — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent