Can cases still under litigation be used as a reason to deny a plaintiff under threat of imminent injury or loss of life the right to proceed in forma pauperis?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1)Can cases still under litigation be used as a reason to deny a plaintiff under threat of imminent injury or loss of life the right to proceed in forma pauperis? See violations of provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), giving rise to this petition. (2)Can the court deem Plaintiff NOT under threat of imminent physical injury without ruling on operative motion outlining cause for allowing plaintiff to proceed LF.P.? See D.E. # 10 in this case: “Application for Temp. Injunction Against Miami-Dade County” as a jurisdiction, pursuant to “Monell,” failed to be ruled on before erroneous denial to allow Plaintiff to proceed I.F.P.? Plaintiff is, in fact, under imminent physical injury, or very real possibility of loss of life, if returned to Miami-Dade County. See D.E. # 10 in the cause failed to be_ruled_on, prior to erroneous dismissal, constituting plain error, and “manifest injustice,” which must be rectified by this court, as a “venue of last resort.” (3)Can entire instant complaint be dismissed without operative, “Application for Temporary Injunction” even having been considered, or ruled upon?) Which essentially embodies all material evidence of imminent.threat(s), and is, in fact, the gist of the overall complaint, of “torture” utilized to induce “pleas,” within the state jurisdiction of Miami-Dade County, Florida.