No. 18-791

Kyle James Moesch v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2018-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: collateral-proceedings collateral-review constitutional-rights douglas-v-california due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-v-ryan right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a prisoner who raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in initial-review collateral proceedings is entitled to the assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 357 (1963), this Court held that prisoners are entitled to counsel on their as-of-right direct appeal because “where the merits of the one and only appeal an indigent has as of right are decided without benefit of counsel... an unconstitutional line has been drawn between rich and poor.” Six years ago, this Court recognized that collateral proceedings that provide the first occasion to raise a claim of ineffective assistance at trial are “in many ways the equivalent of a prisoner’s direct appeal as to the claim.” Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 11-13 (2012). Is a prisoner who raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in initial-review collateral proceedings thus entitled to the assistance of counsel?

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Kyle James Moesch
Gary Alan UdashenUdashen Anton, Petitioner
Gary Alan UdashenUdashen Anton, Petitioner
Texas
Sean K. ProctorBell County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Sean K. ProctorBell County District Attorney's Office, Respondent