No. 18-7911
Albert Miklos Kun v. State Bar of California
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 11th-amendment 14th-amendment bankruptcy-clause bankruptcy-discharge bankruptcy-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-preemption federalism fourteenth-amendment sovereign-immunity standing state-bar Whether petitioner's right to protection by the Eq Whether petitioner's rights protected by the Due P Whether the California Supreme Court may order pay
Key Terms:
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California waived its sovereign immunity to the Bankruptcy Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Question: Whether California waived its sovereign immunity to the Bankruptcy Clause. II. Question: Whether the California Supreme Court may order payment of a debt that has been discharged in Bankruptcy. III. Question: Whether petitioner’s right to protection by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were violated. IV. Question: Whether petitioner’s rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were violated.
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-03-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-19
Waiver of right of respondent The State Bar of California to respond filed.
2019-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Albert M. Kun
Albert Miklos Kun — Petitioner
The State Bar of California
Robert G. Retana — The State Bar of California, Respondent