Whether the District Court Committed substantive error when failed to impose a sentence that was sufficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the statutory directive set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the District Court Committed substantive error when failed to impose a sentence that was sufficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the statutory directive set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Whether there is frivolous issue with regard to Mr. Hernandez's sentence. A review the district court's decision whether to reduce a sentence under * §3582(c)(2). A district court abuse its discretion by filing to apply the proper legal standard by failing to follow proper procedures. Whether Mr. Hernandez's sentence was unconstitutional because Mr. Hernandez's sentence based in 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) was imposed by the sole testimony of Denis Jackson. ii PARTIES Rutilio Hernandez, is the Petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee ; below. Co-defendants Denis W. Jackson Donna Jean Broussard Jose rigoberto Topete Maria Hernandez Robert W. Fansler Ruben Balderas Russel Brousard Santos Topete Sevdastian Salazar Susan M. Jacson Joseph H. Gay Jr, Assistant US Attorney. William Wayne Justice, The Honorable ; iii