No. 18-7921

James Howard Looman, III v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process F.R.A.P.-Rule-22(b) federal-courts federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure fifth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-review standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Fifth Circuit err when it refused to apply 28 U.S.C. §2253(c) and F.R.A.P. Rule 22(b) and follow this Court's commands regarding review of applications for certificates of appealability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ ; | " ‘Did the Fifth Circuit err when it refused to apply 28 U.S.C. §2253(c) and ; F:R.A.P. Rule 22(b) and follow this Court's commands xegarding review of ; applications for certificates of appealability? . . ; li

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

James Looman
James Howard Looman III — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent