Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals error in denying the Petitioner's Subject-Matter Jurisdiction claim

No question identified. : Questionn(s) Presented “ _ Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals error in denying the Petitioner's: : SubjectMatter Jurisdiction claim, where the charging document's statute [26 U.S.C.S. $5845(e)] did not properly state an offense as this court and The United States Congress defined, as The Petitioner's weapon(s) were outside of the penal statutes scope _ of regulation and Subject-Matter, as the Petitioner's weapon(s) fully complied with all federal & state registration requirements, as well as this courts decision(s) in Staples & Freed (refferenced above) as (Pistol(s) nor Revolver(s) having rifled bore(s) can hot be classified as a "Firearm" under The National Firearms Act's definit. . ions [26 U.S.C.S §5845(a) & 26 U.S.C.S §5845(e)] given the statutes’ clear and plain language? ;