Hubert Babb v. Clara Smith, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether indigent and/or pro se defendants in criminal prosecutions have constitutional protection from the presence of socioeconomic discrimination as a prejudicial or determinative motive in their arrest, prosecution, conviction, sentencing and appeal denials
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) wuernen INOIGANT AND/OR PRO SE DEFENDANTS IN CRimiMAL PRoSeQuTionS HAVE OR AA EwTiryes Te CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FRom THE Prasened OF SOCMCECONOMIC DISCAIMINATION AS A PRETUOI cial CR DSTERMINATIVE MOTIVE IN THEIR ARREST, PRoSECUTION, CONVICTION | SENTENCING AND APPEAL DENIALS « (2) wie risa sociczconomic. DISCRIMINATIoN ES SUGH A PREVASTVE ANO ORTAImENTAL OBSTACLE BETWEEN INDIGENT ANO/OR PROSE DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ACCESS To DUE PAccETS | oF LAW AND EQUAL bpeTEerien oF THE Law, In FAILS Ano PR Sons ACROSS THE UNTTED. ‘srares. OF Amaaten, AS TO WARRANT THE INTERVENTION OF THE U.SSUPREME CouRT Te ESTAGMISH PRECEDENT CRITERIA TO IDENTIFY j ANALYZE) Chalience ANQ BUminAtE SucH DISCRImINATIEN AS A PRETUDICIRL OR OETERMINATIVE FACTER IM CRiminal PRostcuT ions. . (3) WHETHER, SPaciRicALy IN BAGB'S CASE; SocioEconoMIG DiSaRimiNATioN WKS A ORTERMINATIVE FRETOR iN His ORIGINAL FALSE ARREST AND MonTfig OF FALSE imPRiSam~mENnT ON CHARGES HE Was NEVER TRIED OR ConvieTED OF. ) WHETHER SocicecoNomic DISCRIMINATION WAS THE DETERMINATINE Motive IN PROSE CuTERS. mali atousLY PRosEcurinG BABB ON Known ;VERIFIAGLe False chaness T? NEGATE THE Stare DP FLoRions iagiliry OF His ORIGINAL False ARREST AND (mei sow manT, (5) witernen, iv perition@r Wusear @age's CASE, THe O@Vious, PEASISTENT Os (RECARD.OF Df RECTLY RecenD VRASPIAGLE ANO FEDERAL Count Conriamed FELONY CRIMES OF . PERTERN Committsp SPECIFICALLY FoR THE PuRPosE OF UNLAWFULLY DEPRIVING BABE OF A NEw TRinL BY A PRIA AND IMPARTIAL, BUT DISREGARDED, EXCUSED AND FaLsaly SuSTFIGd COnrRARY To THE Law; THE RECORD, THE EViogwee AND & WRITTEN FEDERAL REforT, BY -Covats OF EVERY LEVEl Below THE ULSSUPREME Count, STAPE AND Fevennl, (mPiiCates; SUBSTAMTIATES OR A\SES To THE LEVaL OF ESTABLISHING SocleEceHEmic DISERIMINATION AS A PRESUDICIAL OR OETERMINATINE FAcTOR IN BARB'S ARREST, PROSECUTION, CONNICTION SENTENCIMG ANO DENIALS OF muLTIPLE APPEALS ONER Te. Last. 23 Years, ) : =