Gilbert Carrasco v. United States
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Was U.S. District Court, (S.D. Cal.) divested of jurisdiction because of Abney-rule
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was U.S. District Court, (S.D. Cal.) divested of jurisdiction because of . Abney rule to hail Defendant to trial once Petitioner's timely Notice of Appeal was filed in U.S. District Court Clerk's office (S.D. Cal.)? 2. Is Petitioner's judgement ‘conviction and sentence entered in U.S.D.C., (S.D. Cal.), Case No. 3:17-CR-03938 JLS (S.D. Cal.) on July 10th, 2018, sentencing date November 16th, 2018: (Null and Void) due to the twice language in U.S. Const. Amend. V? : 3. Is Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus relief because of not being accorded bail, (in Non-Capital Case) when the Government's compelling reason in U.S. District Court, Imperial County, Central California and U.S. District Court (S.D. Cal.) for not granting defendant bail was flight?