No. 18-793
Marion Quinton Brewster v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment different-occasions legislative-intent sentencing statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act's 'different occasions' provision has become overly broad and vague as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . Whether the interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s “different occasions” provision has become overly broad and vague as to constitute ; cruel and unusual punishment, specifically when the original intention of Congress is disregarded. ;
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-02-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-02-15
Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2019-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent