No. 18-7931

Michael Keith Henley v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure compelled-speech content-neutrality due-process fraudulent-plea-agreement free-speech government-regulation ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice private-property public-forum standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Amendment prohibits the government from requiring private entities to host speech they disagree with

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ue . 1). Whether, the United States Appeal Court and District Court incorrectly decide the facts? (YES) What Facts? : Ga) Whether the U.g Appeal Court and District Court incorrectly decide Mr.Henley, as being timed barred? : .¢b).Whether. the U.s Appeal Court and District Court over-look the plain error Rule 52(b) to Mr.Henley? (c).Whether the U.S Appeal Court and District Court over-look the petitioner showing of multiple Constitution Violations? : (d).Whether the U.S Appeal Court and District Court Erred by denying for aC OA? (e) .Whether the U.S Appeal Court and District Court decision . ~ conflict with the petitioner's supporting case laws? : (£) .Whether the U.S Appeal Court and District Court over-look the fraudulent plea agreement and illegal conviction of Mr. Henley,for a non-existing offense? : . (g).Whether the U.S Appeal Court and District Court over-look the Denial of Effective Assistance of Counsel,that resulted into Miscarriage of Justice to Mr.Henley? : : (i)

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael Henley
Michael K. Henley — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent