Whether the district court failed to properly apply 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) and (c), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a) by not computing time according to the statute and thereby not perform de novo review and determinations, and whether the appellate court sanctioned such failure and thus violated its own mandate pursuant to Article III of the Constitution of the United States and the court's supervisory powers

No question identified. : Questia (s) Presented Whether the dietuvet count fatled to Per ah [o} \ ates 5 On ; C, i | ant bi 1.5.6. 8 6360) (O(B) and(), and fed R. cov. P (a by net Computing Time according to the —_-__ Statute and thereby uot perform De neva Review and Determinations and whether the appellade | court sanctioned such foflure and thus vfslate a t's own mandate pursuant te Avtele Tr of the Constrtutfon of the Untled States and the count 's Supervsory pouielrs if fst Of Parties Al\ vavttes do not ppea fn the captiou of +h tase on the car page. A at of : © all pay iw te the proceed ng tn the cou whose rN udg on each ie 5 the sub Fook of th’ per Cy e ‘ oS 6 oo as follows _ Appeals a Judwe M "a AVA CA Q 4, Drotyeet Court Chook Judge Ghra M. Cyoh . 200 rat