No. 18-7941

Trevor Little v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process ex-post-facto ex-post-facto-clause restitution sentencing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower courts' Fourth Circuit violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 3, when it still enforced the 1994 version of 18 U.S.C. 3613(b) instead of the 1998 version during the time of the petitioner's conviction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Did Bre lovee Couts Foun Ciccut, Vicleed The @bbiones Ex Yost Facto Cluse ot The baled States Consitiction Mebicle ty Section {Clause 3, When Lt Still Entocce “The Fine Pacsusnt Vo USCS Bol 3b) | hs yeil | AY lo Version Lastead ot The _\%4S Version Ducioy The Time o£ love nt? \ a < s | ets eed Trevwr Lathe verse, United Slates of Amecicy ——— — vO NCO ee ee ee a OO ae I Te ee ee ee ee a ——— ee TO ee es Te —— ee Tbe OF Contents ‘Table ol Ruthorities, a Doinisos below, ne “Sucisdicdten, a Reasons Tec Ceasiny The felttion, ~ (-G Conclaslon, as wo ne el ce MUacted Stites Cond of Ngpeds For The fourth Carcaut Order Be ust ab2owv as a ) United Shites Dicteict Cowcl Foe The Southern Diteect of Weel Vir Ta) Charla Daina Dele dbs Aly 2208 is cb Rapala Haines vy Keener Ot USS OU, 7. Kelly 1, Bobiosen (4 US.36 (ie) a ee A Like v Bishoo, CEDMY doe) Lyoce u Mithis, 1 LedadG’ Cl@h,. . ee Miller we Florida Me LEdad a5 Cag7) 7 ned. ites aye DS FAAS CHhGie WO), Unitek Seles 6 Brvclney, (0 Eade (ita Cie ile), 4 P United Sales v. Edusards, teh FAUST Ged Ciel, 2 2 ee Y, | United Sates ve fiicban R2OLUS Dist Lexis lI CDA C2004), 7 arled. Shutes vu Newinan HH FS SLC Cie, _ Unitel Stites _v. Nichols pad Cloth cic, United Sts x. Siegel 188 Fd 12st te Gicle) . $ United Shetes so Willidits OS Fb 0a (Gh cel) oS WUSC 8 U@a) we Wuscs 29.@CcH,. WUSCS BeldO)y a fess WUSCE 3664, _ Whuse § 9s, WUSCS SHAS Muse SMe Conk Me 1,84. cl9, 7 YY pai Bm) “ducisdiction Ts Traveled | wee . Jurisdiction iS wreted bs as USc 8 We | (My Conettitioant AND Silke Peoustans yi ONO ved —2x poi bad Clause barred oo, late touske_«_panclty oat in_etfact___ —_ dwcing ne & Me. & okt ranse, te chee hy M2, andlse Panshinudt, ee on niin estan Dagelied Tiled if United. Sues, Codes Section 2el2lb) sfates_io_pectinent poet es __ 4s Selle \\ow $4 Expiration ot Lien. A View becom es unenforceable’ and lidbibity te _ “i Sine _oxPices-—(H) tinea: dtec the @edry of ——_—_—_{¢ i tine _expices=--(l) Yeats yeacs (ttec th BD eabey ey _ Me yg Cis ae iste] Tile fi Usted States Code Dettiaa 3e130) slits in. facnset pact so alluws, Tecan ot {ishility. The [ub ts_plya fiee ___. Shull tecunindle the titer ef a0 years Leon the entry __ ok Take medt_or Jo years after the cel ease bom pps he Tpeciea Eved argon the ded EE ee Sithemec Of The Case Dn December TAS Teewer Little Cherwetbee refered to ag Retitionse ogee indicted Ina twelve Court tndictmest Fouc ——Causls closeged Ie wiolited QL USCS § Gute, SIN ad 12 USC ES % sewer \$ USC BR. Fetitionec pcos eched to terol on _f ect 20 Rec Hi Bate ae aca has anion al feces ——— cee eee EL TAR Sewtonciag. \year in . elk on oul (S14 the. TOMA Chie cee Judge Con vel x NWohen I roe the Sotlutee Ditivet of West Viewnia ~ Ch LeenDiision, Seateaced Mae Vabihasec te life na coal Lead 19, plas ive jeacs no canst $ te_tuc conceal ye ote ower, Hoe Seatenne in —Couet_uo ssel_ a $9000 Cue tebe pk the the not Eccl despa (parent plan Mane Ue the Buea & Ben | Vedios, moe nen toes jess later swasltsofell force te tthe tine. Soin _ouc “so Ah tetimer Sled a chulles et Neate. coda ed acct te Cost denied the Merron pn j ies QDS and feloner +tled a incl notice x apaal in ne United States Deck Cue tor The Snaths ai Vis ick gt Wh (is =Clnelesten Division, The. Rett tinoss-—pucsued his __£§ clin in Pah United Sabes ¢ oud ef hyouls For The Fact Carealt awd eas. eich Agu Al 206 tettiner then filed ¢ Weil of ———Coctivceci_on Neranbac th.20t inthis S.peame Couct ee ND REASON “FOR GARNTING TRE WALT A The Lower Courts: Foy A . ape 4 _ Xe x ‘pre's | ac Const Eau Cicer visite | es Conttufion Wticle £, Section 4 C\ 3 Pio Bs — ee ied Sa During Une li SOLON Leh. ad OF the [71S \ecsion Dey Tae Tine DE ifs Coouct¢ Tings Sin vedoe ke SS esiecacisduc te ackianel Uted Stakes, Couct a ili duc Seats Coat Qo Teshece Hae gel atte Neeson a pect a apt en — at post Cate clause. Art Net chet clues tales — KK Yetitionerc's fc... aed ge He Ny ause.® when _ Vetitioaee uses chara ed tel

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Trevor Little
Trevor Little — Petitioner
Trevor Little — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent