No. 18-7944
Jerkeno Wallace v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process evidence judicial-discretion non-testifying-defendant remorse remorse-consideration right-to-silence sentencing sentencing-error
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Related Cases:
18-8239
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was there an error by the court at sentencing when court considered observations of the non-testifying defendant as basis of proving no remorse
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : . QUESTION(S} PRESENTED : WAS THERE AN ERROR BY THE COURT AT SENTENCING WHEN COURT CONSIDERED OBSERVATIONS OF THE NON-TESTIFYING DEFENDANT AS BASIS OF PROVING NO REMORSE ~
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Jerkeno Wallace
Jerkeno Wallace — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent