Whether the Michigan Court of Appeals decision to reversed and remanded for a new trial in two similarly situated cases as petitioner's case, conflict with the decision which denied petitioner's constitutional question this Court should address

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; / WHETHER THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION TO REVERSED ANO REMANDED FOR ANEWTRIAL IN TWO SIMMARLY SITUATED _ CASES AS PETITIONERS CASE, CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION WHICH DEN JED PETTTVONER, KS A COMSTITUTIONAL QUESTION THIS COURT SHOUD ADORESS £ 2. WHETHER THEMICHIGANM SUPREMECOURTS DECISION THAT OEMIEO PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FOR FAILING TO MEET THE/BUR DEVAL AS TNBLISHIME ENTITLEMENT M0 REUEF UNDERM CRG, 5060) “6000 CAUSE, 1S ERRONEOUS WITHA CLAIM OF TUQICIAL BIAS ©