No. 18-7949

In Re Reginald Watson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2241-motion career-offender civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court-jurisdiction due-process habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-2241 jurisdiction sentencing standard-of-review standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court erred in dismissing Watson's 2241 motion for lack of jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTIONED PRESENTED QUESTION #1Whether the District Court erred in dismissing , Watsons 2241 motion for lack of jurisdiction? ; QUESTION #2Whether in light of Decamps v United States, or Mathis v United States or United States v Hinkle,Watsons prior conviction does not qualify him as a career offender? . Page B | 1 3 :

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-01-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Reginald Watson
Reginald Watson — Petitioner
Reginald Watson — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent