No. 18-7957

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Mikel Steinfeld

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-procedure-abuse-of-discretion compulsory-process constitutional-question due-process jurisdiction sixth-amendment-compulsory-process standing
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the judge's denial of leave to amend complaint is a reversible error

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions) PRESENTED | ; |. Whether ov not, the. Judge Teilborg's denial oF Leave to | Autud Complaint is a reversible. exer? Ss 2. Whetheov not ; Judge Teilborg: Abused Ws dis| retin im Concluding Ov, not Concluding tat Appeltee's Act was Uncle cate, of State law “whkeh is a 3. Whether or nif, Judge Teilbory, exceeded bes Sunsdictin in determinving thal; Appellant did. | NOT Stote a Claim ) Under the, Cevsttudional Gestion of Compulsory Pucess of Sixth Amend met © . | , |

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner
Mikel Steinfeld
Mikel Patrick SteinfeldMaricopa County Office of the Public Defender, Respondent
Mikel Patrick SteinfeldMaricopa County Office of the Public Defender, Respondent