No. 18-7963
Fredmun Wayne Reynolds v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus prisoner-rights procedural-rules rules-of-civil-procedure state-prisoner statute statute-interpretation timeliness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a district court's dismissal of a state prisoner's habeas petition under Habeas Rule 4 for lack of timeliness violate statute, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and the historical practice of habeas corpus?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. DOES A DISTRICT COURT’S DISMISSAL OF A STATE PRISONER'S HABEAS PETITION UNDER HABEAS RULE 4, FOR LACK OF TIMELINESS, VIOLATE STATUTE, THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AND THE HISTORICAL PRACTICE OF HABEAS CORPUS? ii
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Fredmun Wayne Reynolds
Fredmun Reynolds — Petitioner
Noah Nagy, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent