Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with this court's long standing rulings on the known and willing use of perjury of material fact, the known and willing subornation of perjury, thereby depriving a person of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment protected Constitutional Rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a 1) Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with : 7 this courts long standing rulings on the known and willing.use : of PERJURY of material fact, the known and willing subornation of PERJURY, thereby depriving a person of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment protected Constitutional Rights. ; 2) Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with [+ this courts long standing rulings on ineffective assistance of counsel, when counsel fails to: Secure exculpatory evidence, : . known. to the prosecution, but withheld or destoryed; introduce favorable evidence showing no predisposition; introduce ‘ evidence supporting defendants entrapment defense; subject the prosecution's case and witnesses to meaningful adversarial u questioning; fails to object to perjury or elicit the truth; i fails to motion for a mistrial when PERJURY was admitted at sentensing or on direct appeal; and adequatly fails to prepare . for trial. ; . . : : 3) Whether. the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with ; this and other circuit court rulings on the issuance of a. _ Certificate of Appealablility, or the necessity of an evidentuary hearing upon the presentation of a colorable claim of PERJURY; perform its sworn... duty to prevent perjury and prosecutorial misconduct. i 4) Is the term ‘substantial showing' Constitutionally vague Oo when PERJURY is admitted. . . . ; : :