Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions

esTION PRESENTED WHEN THE PETiTioneR GeRaLn Apcer 4F05-B-1254 WAIVED HIS RIGHT For A JuRY TRIAL, WAS THE JUDGE SUPPOSE To DENY GERALD ADGER WAIVER OF THE JURY TRIAL BECAUSE an HUNTLEY HEARING WAS HELD AND Found THaT THe PETITIONER GERALD ADGER #05-8-2754 PRE-TRIAL STATEMENTS WERE vorunTaRy any an TRIAL ON THE MERITS BY A JUDGE ALonEe WOULD Depeive THe Perinoner Gerard Apcer #O5-B-2254 oF an SECondD DETERMINATION, BY A JURY, oF THe VOLUNTARINESS oF INCU LPATORY STATEMENTS » MADE BY THE Petitioner Gerad ADoER FF O5-®-2254 (PEOPLE v. DICosTANZO, 31AD24 250,252 CUM DEPT 19691, AFFD 26MY2d Joly ios) 7?