Whether an ALL WRITS ACT Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (Audita Querela) fills the GAP where a Defendant [does not] have no other appropriate vehicle to pursue a CLARIFICATION of the application of RELEVANT CONDUCT (1B13(a) (1) (B)) under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, turns on whether UNITED STATES v. MORGAN, 346 U.S. 502 (1954) still stands as the supreme Law of the Land?

The SECOND question is, did the district court have jurisdiction under the ALL WRITS ACT (28 U.S.C. § 1651 [Audita Querela]) to open up the original Criminal Action Case Judgment based on a CLARIFYING AMENDMENT (790), to correct the misapplied sentence under RELEVANT CONDUCT (§ 1B1.3(a) (1) (B))?

Whether an All Writs Act petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (Audita Querela) fills the gap where a defendant has no other appropriate vehicle to pursue a clarification of the application of relevant conduct (§ 1B1.3(a)(1)(B)) under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, turns on whether United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502 (1954) still stands as the supreme Law of the Land?