No. 18-7986
Maurin Chacon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 794 amendment-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law judicial-review plain-error plain-error-standard rosales-mireles rosales-mireles-v-united-states sentencing statutory-interpretation united-states-v-olan
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a amendment violation of 794 warrant a plain error review under Rosales-Mireles
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 585 U.S. (2018). Clarified the Plain Error Standard in United States v. Olan, 507 U.S. ~ 725, 736 (1993). Does a ammendment violation of 794 warrant a plain error review under Rosales-Mireles, Id. (i)
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Maurin Chacon
Maurin Chacon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent