Whether the lower court erred in its application of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause to the facts of this case

No question identified. : ee oe 1. Whether applying 0.C.G.A. 9-11-9.1 to claims of |. Cay, Cosy ~~. .: battery disallowing a claim..of battery without an ca : ce =! expert witness affidavit is lawful and violates the Babb! ; . . inviolability of a person’s:right to control their body. 2s: aoe 2 or the holding of a County Ba ; . »-.3: “Superior. Court hearing to:dismiss without having a | -: , ae .. eourt.reporter present to record the hearing violates | : ; i oe 3. Whether requiring one party in litigation to notify pe Boba i‘: the other parties-of hearing: dates. rather than the Dts # oe __..*-eourt doing so violates right. to due process and équal .. ... Be A | protection. aos paboc i a co ane BO Deborah J Davis, Petitioner oer, eee cre ae an 5 Bs : and in behalf of deceased spouse Frank H. Davis, Jr. oe as es i, 200 Morris Hill Road © BOE, ne eds = PS Canton,GA 80114. ee 770 720 8349. a aa oe Dy, Mehul Bhatt, MD; Respondent Ey “Counsel Heather'H: Miller, (050805; ene ae Q bog a Weathington McGrew Attorneys At Law... ene Be a oe 191 Peachtree Street; NE, Suite 3900; 0: gals eT bob Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Pub dion, BUD b, Eby : ce RULE 29 STATEMENT ana: as ce Pursuant, to Supreme Court Rule 29.6; petitioner eo, Os -" ".:.; states that'it has no parent companies or nonwholly ce 5 noe »-: owned subsidiaries. ca aoe Se a beg eas