No. 18-7995
Rodney Martin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion procedural-error reasonableness-of-sentence section-3553a sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court improperly sentence Mr. Martin and did the appellate court improperly affirm the trial court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented L The trial court sentenced Mr. Martin to 168 months in prison, but the court did not adequately address Mr. Martin’s arguments or the Section 3553(a) factors. The court also did not adequately explain why 168 months was a sentence that was sufficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of Section 3553(a). Did the trial court improperly sentence Mr. Martin and did the appellate court improperly affirm the trial court? 1
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Rodney Martin
Mary Chartier — Chartier & Nyamfukudza, P.L.C., Petitioner
Mary Chartier — Chartier & Nyamfukudza, P.L.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent