Were the lower courts manipulated by internal and/or external influences to deny petitioner his state and federal constitutional rights of protection?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Said writ of certiorari presents a simple question, regarding issues that began in 1987 and are present today. Were the lower courts manipulated by internal and/or external influences to deny petitioner his state and federal constitutional rights of protection? . Did the court violate a “clear legal duty,” that is failure to act, or that their actions were arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable, amounting to a gross abuse of : discretion, so as to entitle petitioner to his constitutional rights regarding the following? Flawed Service of Due Process and No Notice to Mortgagee(s) Regarding the above, to the extent necessary to a decision and when presented, did ; the reviewing court decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an its action. Did the reviewing court (1) compel its action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside its action, findings, and conclusions found to be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (D) without observance of procedure required by law; (E)unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of . this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of itself a hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. In making the foregoing determinations, did the court review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a said petitioner party, and due accounts were taken of the rule of prejudicial error. . Is the Hispanic heritage of the petitioner, Raoul Armando Galan Jr., currently a factor and past pleadings of petitioner are factors of discrimination by not protecting his rights as an American citizen by the United States Constitution? Can this court grant certiorari petitioner and or to the United States Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit to determine whether a reasonable jury can find for petitioner due to the issue of negligence in the United States District Courts, United : States Bankruptcy Court and the United States Court of Appeal for the Fifth . Circuit as well as the overwhelming evidence on behalf of petitioner with respect of past decisions from different lower courts across the USA? Are there genuine issues of material fact regarding the above questions that satisfies the court that not only rescinds the sale of petitioner's properties, but nullifies the initial judgment against petitioner due to the rules of the courts, laws of the State of Louisiana and laws of the United States of America?