No. 18-8011
Kevin Kerr v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1988 6th-amendment civil-rights competency criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech pardon pro-se-appearance psychological-evidence self-representation sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 42 U.S.C. § 1988(a) confer jurisdiction on the respondent, the United States District Court, and the United States Court of Appeals conveying to them protection of divine providence as invoked in their respective oaths and as is necessary to the accommodation and vindication of this petitioner's 'pro se appearance' in the criminal adversarial testing process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ___
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Barr, Att'y Gen. to respond filed.
2018-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Barr, Att'y Gen.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent