No. 18-8013

Paul Pieczynski v. Wells Fargo and Company, N.A.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-procedures due-process federal-jurisdiction land-patent supremacy-clause takings time treaty-law update weather
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

If one is entitled to update a land patent, is there a time of day, time of year, season, weather event, or anything that would bar the update?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , If one is entitled to update a land patent, is there a time of day, time of year, season, weather event, or anything that would bar the update? ; Did the land patent lose its legal authority? If so when? Ifa land patent does lose it legal authority is it nun pro tunc? ; Does treaty Law and Constitutionally secured Rights fall under federal jurisdiction? Do court procedures, rules and codes carry superiority to treaty Law and Constitutionally secured Rights and negate the force and effect of a patent? If the land patent has legal authority can any lesser court rule on the force and effect of the land patent? : ; Does a color of title sheriff deed carry superiority to a land patent? Should the people of these united States of America be sanctioned even criminally sanctioned for updating, perfecting a land patent? Is the following citation reliable? The Court is bound by the supremacy clause of the Constitution to uphold the treaty making your Patent a statutory limitation throughout the land. Wineman vy. Gastrell 54 FED 819, 2 U.S. App. 581 (1892) β€˜ Is this citation reliable? Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating ; his solemn oath to support it.” Ifa land patent maintains its’ lawful authority and the people can be sanctioned for updating a patent, ought not public servants and attorneys be sanction for ; attempting to eviscerate the patent, violating their oath? CASES

Docket Entries

2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-17
Application (18A1031) denied by Justice Alito.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-29
Application (18A1031) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Alito.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2019)

Attorneys

Paul Pieczynski
Paul Pieczynski — Petitioner
Paul Pieczynski — Petitioner
Wells Fargo and Co.
Henry F. ReichnerReed Smith, LLP, Respondent
Henry F. ReichnerReed Smith, LLP, Respondent