Was Petitioner denied due process of law and the right to be convicted only upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED _ T Uns faditinner denied a Coie teal, dine prneess of law and the tight +o be comiched upon proof beyerd reasonable dou} — hes he instante of tidlatagsection 1 guldiaisiod (bin) tn absence of substantial evidence that the conduct —Was_perpetrated with the teguisike force feme,iolence ducess;Menate, or Lear of Wodily tayury? TL. Was Petitioner denied a fair tral due process of law andthe wright ta be.couuicted only upon ptoot be yoad.a quantal Inthe aloseice of substoatial evidence that conduct with requisite Corce, Lear, violence, duress) SEE ins fubtinet died aflobilal due pncss.o€ lau Herighe determine each element ofan offense hoyond outerssaable doubt where Yhe trial court Garled te instruct the _juty-onan esseitial element of the coime of aggrausted sexualassaull by meats Of seXal penetration by fore ? TW, Was Petetoner denied afar trial and due process of law where the prosecutan seeks te inflame the passions ata predic, ——wikness ducing trial regarding uncharged cevdal abuse Whole the evidence sina gresioucly utdlgdlased and nas elieied Without agesd lath bolie€ tne information opicted 7? SE, Was fotitioner denied alate drial and due proces of ladthe tight to he effective assistance of counseloud the sighe Strike potentially béas os, Called to obtala medical expert —4acmiscorduct by prosecutor and tivo pretrial Marden —__motisns Were domed? a ee ee ee ee