Whether the determination by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals with respect to Petitioner's COA application improperly deviated from the mandates of this Court and of Congress such that Petitioner was denied his rights to appeal the disposal of his habeas corpus petition and to due process of law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the determination by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals with respect to Petitioner's COA application improperly deviated from the mandates of this Court and of Congress such that Petitioner was denied his rights to appeal the disposal of his habeas corpus petition and to due process of law? 2. Whether the Appellate Court's denial of a COA as to Petitioner's grounds for relief -the "plea negotiation" ground, wherein he alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right by counsel's admitted error in refusing to independently investigate the Government's contentions; the "testimony threat” ground, wherein , he alleged violations of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by counsel's admitted coercion of his decision against taking the stand in his own defense; and the "PSR objection"/"Rule 32" ground, wherein he alleged that the failure to address his issues at sentencing, and the failure to address this claim on collateral review, violated Rules 32(c)(3)(D) and 32(i)(3)(B) of , the F.R.Crim.P. and his rights to. due process of law-was thus contrary to clearly-established precedent?. 3. Whether the Supreme Court should exercise its supervisory power and resolve a circuit split by declaring that courts must properly address and resolve all constitutional claims presented in habeas petitions prior to disposing thereof? :