Whether the newly discovered evidence presented to the lower Courts was sufficient to toll the one year Statute of Limitation set forth in the 48 U.S.C § 2244 of the Anti-Terrorism Effective Death Penalty Act (A.E.D.P.A.)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED See Next Fag @ . , QUESTLONG) PRESENTED Whether the newly discovered evidence presented to the lower Courts was sufficient to fol] the one year . Statute of Vimitedion setforth in tHe 48 uS.C§ 2244 of the Anti-Terrorism Effective Death Fenalty Act 7@.£.0.2.6) Whether the Conshitutionality of Title 28 Us.0.§ aa 44 (AED.PA) One year stetute of limitation on Habeas Corpus (9454) should be revisited by this Court ? Whether Petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment Const tutional . Right to have effective assistance of counsel in hss defense daring 7 “All critical stages of trial proceding 7 Whether Title 28 US.C.§ 2244 @.£0.2.A) inhibits the filing of legitimate Federal A254 4 2255 Petitions for Writs of Habeas Corpus Filed by rose inmates: In vielation of the First i Amendment rie United States Constitution 7 DAInd to Pek bon the Government for Redvess af Grievances’. ;