William Bolden v. Pennsylvania
Securities Immigration
Was petitioner sentenced under a statute that violate due process of law under the United States Constitution by permitting a trial court to impose an enhanced sentence well beyond the statutory maximum based on a prior conviction, a fact that was not established by a jury or proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
QUESTION PRESENTED: A). WAS PETITIONER SENTENCED UNDERASTATUTE THAT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE ; UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BY PERMITTING A TRIAL _| COURT TO-EMPOSE AN ENHANCED SENTENCE WELL BEYOND THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM BASED ON A PRIOR CONVICTION, A FACT THAT WAS NOT ESTABLISHED BY A JURY OR PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT ? — (this . _ _ issue was raised. in petitioner’s direct appeal in the Superior court at NO: 2605-EDA-2010, by : petitioner’s direct appeal attorney, prior to petitioner’s filing of a PCRA petition). SEE: attached. EXHIBIT (N)Superior court document’s of NO: 2605-EDA-2010, listed as page’s, (29), (30), and (31)). : ,