No. 18-8032

Edgar Arellano v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance pre-trial-investigation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) QUESTION NUMBER ONE _ | ‘PETITIONER'S Coun SEL WAS TNEFFECTIVE W FAILING To CompucT A REASONABLE PRE TRIAL INVESTIGATION. THIS VIOLATED PETITIONERS Rigut To CounSEL, AS GuARANTEED BY AMENDMENTS 6 AND 14 To THe US. Constitution, QUESTioN NUMBER Two PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED OW THE Basis OF AQuikt? PieR THAT WAS THE PRobUCT OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, THIS VIOLATED PETIT OVER RIGHT To COUNSEL AND To DUE PROCESS OF Law AS Gua@anteeO BY AmewomenTS 6,5 ANo IY TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. | QUESTion NUMBER THREE | PETITIONER APPEIATE Counsel Was INEFFECTWE WW FAILING To AUQMENT THE APPELLATE REGORD WiTH THE REPORTERS TRANSCRIPS OF THE PRELIMWARY HEARWG To CoueT CASE (+ VoF0093 ) To SHoW THAT PETITIONER'S “PRIOR WAS SWVALID. THId ViokatzD PETITIONERS Right To Coun SEL, AS QuARAN TEED BY AMENDMENTS 6 AnD I To THE US. Constitution,

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Edgar Arellano
Edgar Arellano — Petitioner
Edgar Arellano — Petitioner