No. 18-8039

James Barstad v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus invasion jurisdiction legal-standing suspension venue void-ab-initio war
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus been suspended in America? If so, what entity has declared war against and invaded America?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Has the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus been suspended in Amaricad If sa, what entity has declared war against and invaded America? 2, Could STATE OF WASHINGTON CORPORATION and/or UNITED STATES CORPORATION abtain Personal and/or Subjlect Matter Jurisdiction, and Venue)! aver James-Benjlamin; Barsted, a Private Natural Man without a Contract granting them said Jurisdiction and/or Venue4 3. If STATE OF WASHINGTON CORPORATION and/or UNTTED STATES CORPIRATION acteds without jurisdiction, is such action Void ab Initio’ : 4 If, ance challenged, Jurisdiction, venue, and the cause and nature of the charge(s) are mot orovem, dogs this them constitute a compulsory counterclaim, pursdant to FRCP 13(a), requiring remedy in lew, due to and owing to the Petitioner, Secured Party/Creditor, who has become

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2019)

Attorneys

James Barstad
James Barstad — Petitioner
James Barstad — Petitioner