No. 18-8042

Aaron Maurice Blaylock, aka Stephan Blaylock v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-U.S.C-924(c)(3)(B) 18-usc-924(c)(3)(B) 18-usc-924c 28-usc-2255 certificate-of-appealability constitutional-challenge due-process habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states motion-to-vacate residual-clause unconstitutional
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a certificate of appealability have issued after the district court denied as untimely a 28-U.S.C-2255-motion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should a certificate of appealability have issued after the district court denied as untimely a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate that sought to challenge the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) based on this Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), which held the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 92.4(e)(2)(B)Gi) to be unconstitutional? ii

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Aaron Maurice Blaylock, aka Stephan Blaylock
Christopher Aaron HoltFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent