No. 18-8062
Saundra Taylor v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion administrative-law appellate-procedure appellate-review discretionary-review dismissal-with-prejudice due-process judicial-deference judicial-review standard-of-review substantial-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether memorandum and opinion is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, is not in accordance to the law and an abused of discretion
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether memorandum and opinion is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, is not in accordance to the law and an abused of discretion. 2. Whether D.C. Court of Appeals committed reversible error in affirming CRB's August 18, 2017 decision and order that affirmed a dismissal with prejudice.
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia Department of Employment Services to respond filed.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Verizon Communications, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)
Attorneys
District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Verizon Communications, Inc.
Curtis B. Hanes — Friedlander Misler, PLLC, Respondent
Curtis B. Hanes — Friedlander Misler, PLLC, Respondent