No. 18-8066

Roger E. Magana v. Ron Credio, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process effective-counsel habeas-corpus impartial-jury ninth-circuit sixth-amendment supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Ninth Circuit's memorandum decision contravene this Court's rulings affirming the guarantees of effective counsel and an impartial jury for a person accused of serious crimes?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Ninth Circuit’s memorandum decision contravene this Court’s rulings affirming the guarantees of effective counsel and an impartial jury for a person accused of serious crimes? i

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondents Ron Credio, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceAppendix

Attorneys

Roger Magana
Anthony David Bornstein — Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon, Petitioner
Anthony David Bornstein — Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon, Petitioner
Ron Credio, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent